Собственно авторы статьи открытым текстом говорят:
"Our results also shed light on the question of the origins of the subset of Indo-European languages spoken in India and Europe (45). It is striking that the great majority of Indo-European speakers today living in both Europe and South Asia harbor large fractions of ancestry related to Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists (corresponding genetically to the Steppe_EMBA cluster),suggesting that “Late Proto-Indo-European”—the language ancestral to all modern Indo European languages—was the language of the Yamnaya"
While ancient DNA studies have documented westward movements of peoples from the Steppe that plausibly spread this ancestry to Europe (5, 31), there has not been ancient DNA evidence of the chain of transmission to South Asia. Our documentation of a large-scale genetic pressure from Steppe_MLBA groups in the 2nd millennium BCE provides a prime candidate, a finding that is consistent with archaeological evidence of connections between material culture in the Kazakh middle-to-late Bronze Age. Steppe and early Vedic culture in India.
Our analysis also provides an entirely new line of evidence for a linkage between Steppe ancestry and Indo-European culture. When we used qpAdm to test if a mixture of ANI and ASI is a fit to the data for all 140 Indian Cline groups, we found 10 groups with poor fits and a significantly elevated ratio of Steppe_MLBA- to Indus_Periphery-related ancestry compared to the expectation for the model (Z≥3)
Нет там нникаких двойных трактовок - материалы, результаты, все достаточно однозначно. Наверное пора прекращать спикуляции с иранскими и анатолийскими прародинами ИЕ.